Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Puerto de la Cruz
for digital nomads
Under balanced weights the two cities tie. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria is stronger on nothing outright; Puerto de la Cruz on nothing outright. Change the weights in the ranker to see which one wins for you.
Europe's winter-sun nomad base
Full Las Palmas de Gran Canaria profile →Where to stay in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria →Tenerife's green north-coast resort with black-sand beaches and Manrique's sea pools
Full Puerto de la Cruz profile →Hotels in Spain →Factor scores (0–100, balanced weights)
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of living | 29 | 29 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Healthcare | 88 | 88 |
| Internet | 82 | 82 ✓ |
| Visa ease | 80 | 80 |
| Getting there & around | 72 ✓ | 68 |
| Climate | 100 | 100 |
| Air quality | 88 | 92 ✓ |
| Quality of life | 80 | 80 |
Cost
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost, one personcountry-level estimate for at least one city | $2,200 | $2,200 |
| Central one-bedroom rent | no data | no data |
Safety and health (country-level)
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Homicides per 100k | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Political stability (0–100) | 68.7 | 68.7 |
| UHC service coverage (0–100) | 84 | 84 |
| Life expectancy | 82.7 yrs | 82.7 yrs |
Internet (M-Lab measured medians)
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Download | 61.8 Mbps ✓ | 59.6 Mbps |
| Upload | 51.3 Mbps | 67.1 Mbps ✓ |
Visa
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Nomad visa | International teleworking visa (digital nomad visa) | International teleworking visa (digital nomad visa) |
| Minimum income for the visa | $2,741/mo | $2,741/mo |
| Entry, US passport | 90 days | 90 days |
| Entry, EU passport | unlimited | unlimited |
| Entry, UK passport | 90 days | 90 days |
Getting there and around
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Non-stop airport destinations | 118 | 129 ✓ |
| Walkability (1–5, editorial) | 4 | 4 |
| Transit (1–5, editorial) | 3 ✓ | 2 |
Climate and air
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Puerto de la Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| Comfortable months per year | 12 | 12 |
| Annual mean PM2.5 | 10.4 µg/m³ | 8.6 µg/m³ ✓ |
✓ marks the better value in each row; ties and missing data are left unmarked.
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria or Puerto de la Cruz?
- Puerto de la Cruz is cheaper: about $2,200 per month versus $2,200 for one person.
- Is Las Palmas de Gran Canaria or Puerto de la Cruz safer?
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria scores higher on safety (76 vs 76), based on national homicide rates and World Bank political-stability scores.
- Where is the internet faster, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria or Puerto de la Cruz?
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria: a measured median of 61.8 Mbps versus 59.6 Mbps (M-Lab, 2024).
More comparisons
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Santa Cruz de Tenerife
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Arrecife (Lanzarote)
- Puerto de la Cruz vs Santa Cruz de Tenerife
- Puerto de la Cruz vs Arrecife (Lanzarote)
- All comparisons
Sources: Cost of Living Global 2026 (city rows); 2026 Cost of Living Index (country level); Worldwide Governance Indicators — Political Stability and Absence of Violence (score 0–100); Victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population (national data, latest year); UHC service coverage index; Life expectancy at birth (years), both sexes; M-Lab NDT statistics (city aggregates, 2024); Airport destinations (Wikipedia airline and destination tables); NASA POWER climatology (2001–2020 monthly means); WHO Ambient Air Quality Database, June 2026 update (V8); Human Development Index (HDR 2025, HDI 2023); EF English Proficiency Index 2024 (band); Walkability and transit ratings (editorial); Passport Index dataset (visa requirements, 199 passports × 199 destinations); OpenStreetMap restaurants (Overpass API); Nostos long-stay visa guides; Starlink availability map. Dataset 2026.10.7. See each city page for per-metric footnotes and the methodology.