Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Santa Cruz de Tenerife
for digital nomads
Under balanced weights Santa Cruz de Tenerife edges it, 75 to 75, winning 2 of the 9 factors. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria is stronger on nothing outright; Santa Cruz de Tenerife on nothing outright. Change the weights in the ranker to see which one wins for you.
Europe's winter-sun nomad base
Full Las Palmas de Gran Canaria profile →Year-round spring on the biggest Canary Island
Full Santa Cruz de Tenerife profile →Factor scores (0–100, balanced weights)
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of living | 33 | 33 |
| Safety | 77 | 77 |
| Healthcare | 87 | 87 |
| Internet | 78 | 81 ✓ |
| Visa ease | 90 | 90 |
| Getting there & around | 42 | 43 ✓ |
| Climate | 100 | 100 |
| Air quality | 88 ✓ | 86 |
| Quality of life | 80 | 80 |
Cost
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost, one personcountry-level estimate for at least one city | $2,200 | $2,200 |
| Central one-bedroom rent | no data | no data |
Safety and health (country-level)
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Homicides per 100k | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Political stability (0–100) | 65.8 | 65.8 |
| UHC service coverage (0–100) | 84 | 84 |
| Life expectancy | 82.7 yrs | 82.7 yrs |
Internet (M-Lab measured medians)
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Download | 61.8 Mbps | 69.6 Mbps ✓ |
| Upload | 51.3 Mbps | 54.5 Mbps ✓ |
Visa
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Nomad visa | International Telework Visa (Digital Nomad, Ley 14/2013 amended Dec 2022) | International Telework Visa (Digital Nomad, Ley 14/2013 amended Dec 2022) |
| Minimum income for the visa | $2,714/mo | $2,714/mo |
| Visa-free days, US passport | 90 days | 90 days |
| Visa-free days, EU passport | unlimited | unlimited |
| Visa-free days, UK passport | 90 days | 90 days |
Getting there and around
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Non-stop airport destinations | 118 | 129 ✓ |
| Walkability (1–5, editorial) | 4 | 4 |
| Transit (1–5, editorial) | 3 | 3 |
Climate and air
| Metric | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Santa Cruz de Tenerife |
|---|---|---|
| Comfortable months per year | 12 | 12 |
| Annual mean PM2.5 | 10.4 µg/m³ ✓ | 11.1 µg/m³ |
✓ marks the better value in each row; ties and missing data are left unmarked.
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria or Santa Cruz de Tenerife?
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife is cheaper: about $2,200 per month versus $2,200 for one person.
- Is Las Palmas de Gran Canaria or Santa Cruz de Tenerife safer?
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria scores higher on safety (77 vs 77), based on national homicide rates and World Bank political-stability scores.
- Where is the internet faster, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria or Santa Cruz de Tenerife?
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife: a measured median of 69.6 Mbps versus 61.8 Mbps (M-Lab, 2024).
More comparisons
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Funchal (Madeira)
- Las Palmas de Gran Canaria vs Valletta
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife vs Funchal (Madeira)
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife vs Valletta
- All comparisons
Sources: Cost of Living Global 2026 (city rows); 2026 Cost of Living Index (country level); Digital Nomad Visas 2026; Worldwide Governance Indicators — Political Stability and Absence of Violence (score 0–100); Estimates of rates of homicides per 100 000 population; UHC service coverage index; Life expectancy at birth (years), both sexes; M-Lab NDT statistics (city aggregates, 2024); Airport destinations (Wikipedia airline and destination tables); NASA POWER climatology (2001–2020 monthly means); WHO Ambient Air Quality Database, June 2026 update (V8); Human Development Index (HDR 2025, HDI 2023); EF English Proficiency Index 2024 (band); Walkability and transit ratings (editorial); Passport Index dataset (visa requirements, 199 passports × 199 destinations). Dataset 2026.09.4. See each city page for per-metric footnotes and the methodology.