Bareilly vs Pakse
for digital nomads
Under balanced weights Bareilly edges it, 49 to 47, winning 4 of the 9 factors. Bareilly is stronger on quality of life; Pakse on nothing outright. Change the weights in the ranker to see which one wins for you.
Uttar Pradesh trading city of bamboo, surma and the jhumka
Full Bareilly profile →Plan a trip to Bareilly →Southern Laos hub for the Bolaven Plateau and the 4,000 islands
Full Pakse profile →Plan a trip to Pakse →Where they differ
- Quality of life. Bareilly leads on quality of life, 43 to 28, against Pakse.
- Cost of living. Bareilly leads on cost of living, 88 to 79, against Pakse. Monthly cost, one person: $750 vs $900.
- Internet. Bareilly leads on internet, 60 to 53, against Pakse. Measured download: 23.2 Mbps vs 15.2 Mbps.
Where they are close. Within five points on healthcare, air quality, visa ease, climate.
Pick Bareilly if you want
- to spend about $150 less a month
- faster internet (23.2 Mbps measured)
Pick Pakse if you want
- the safer country figures
Factor scores (0–100, balanced weights)
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of living | 88 ✓ | 79 |
| Safety | 55 | 61 ✓ |
| Healthcare | 63 ✓ | 59 |
| Internet | 60 ✓ | 53 |
| Visa ease | 32 | 34 ✓ |
| Getting there & around | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Climate | 42 | 42 |
| Air quality | 51 | 54 ✓ |
| Quality of life | 43 ✓ | 28 |
Cost
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost, one personcountry-level estimate for at least one city | $750 ✓ | $900 |
| Central one-bedroom rent | no data | no data |
Safety and health (country-level)
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Homicides per 100k | 2.72 ✓ | 6.4 |
| Political stability (0–100) | 55 | 75.3 ✓ |
| UHC service coverage (0–100) | 69 ✓ | 64 |
| Life expectancy | 71 yrs ✓ | 69.7 yrs |
Internet (M-Lab measured medians)
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Download | 23.2 Mbps ✓ | 15.2 Mbps |
| Upload | 7.8 Mbps ✓ | 6.9 Mbps |
Visa
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Nomad visa | none listed | none listed |
| Minimum income for the visa | no data | no data |
| Entry, US passport | e-visa required | visa on arrival ✓ |
| Entry, EU passport | e-visa required | visa on arrival ✓ |
| Entry, UK passport | e-visa required | visa on arrival ✓ |
Getting there and around
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Non-stop airport destinations | 4 | 5 ✓ |
| Walkability (1–5, editorial) | 2 | 3 ✓ |
| Transit (1–5, editorial) | 1 | 1 |
Climate and air
| Metric | Bareilly | Pakse |
|---|---|---|
| Comfortable months per year | 5 | 5 |
| Annual mean PM2.5 | 27 µg/m³ | 25.6 µg/m³ ✓ |
✓ marks the better value in each row; ties and missing data are left unmarked.
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, Bareilly or Pakse?
- Bareilly is cheaper: about $750 per month versus $900 for one person.
- Is Bareilly or Pakse safer?
- Pakse scores higher on safety (61 vs 55), based on national homicide rates and World Bank political-stability scores.
- Where is the internet faster, Bareilly or Pakse?
- Bareilly: a measured median of 23.2 Mbps versus 15.2 Mbps (M-Lab, 2024).
More comparisons
Sources: Cost of Living Global 2026 (city rows); 2026 Cost of Living Index (country level); Digital Nomad Visas 2026; Worldwide Governance Indicators — Political Stability and Absence of Violence (score 0–100); Estimates of rates of homicides per 100 000 population; Victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population (national data, latest year); UHC service coverage index; Life expectancy at birth (years), both sexes; M-Lab NDT statistics (city aggregates, 2024); Airport destinations (Wikipedia airline and destination tables); NASA POWER climatology (2001–2020 monthly means); WHO Ambient Air Quality Database, June 2026 update (V8); SatPM2.5 satellite-derived annual PM2.5 (V6.GL.02.04); Human Development Index (HDR 2025, HDI 2023); EF English Proficiency Index 2024 (band); Walkability and transit ratings (editorial); Passport Index dataset (visa requirements, 199 passports × 199 destinations); OpenStreetMap restaurants (Overpass API); Starlink availability map. Dataset 2026.11.2. See each city page for per-metric footnotes and the methodology.