Changwon vs Ulsan
for digital nomads
Under balanced weights Ulsan edges it, 62 to 61, winning 1 of the 9 factors. Changwon is stronger on nothing outright; Ulsan on climate. Change the weights in the ranker to see which one wins for you.
Planned industrial capital with Korea's biggest cherry blossom festival
Full Changwon profile →Plan a trip to Changwon →Korea's industrial powerhouse with a riverside garden and rugged coast
Full Ulsan profile →Plan a trip to Ulsan →Where they differ
- Climate. Ulsan leads on climate, 25 to 8, against Changwon. Comfortable months: 1 vs 3.
- Getting there & around. Changwon leads on getting there & around, 22 to 17, against Ulsan. Non-stop airport destinations: 50 vs 50.
Where they are close. Within five points on internet, air quality, cost of living, safety, healthcare, visa ease, quality of life.
Pick Changwon if you want
- no clear edge over Ulsan in the data
Pick Ulsan if you want
- a longer comfortable season (3 months against 1)
Factor scores (0–100, balanced weights)
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of living | 35 | 35 |
| Safety | 87 | 87 |
| Healthcare | 92 | 92 |
| Internet | 89 ✓ | 88 |
| Visa ease | 61 | 61 |
| Getting there & around | 22 ✓ | 17 |
| Climate | 8 | 25 ✓ |
| Air quality | 66 ✓ | 66 |
| Quality of life | 83 | 83 |
Cost
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost, one personcountry-level estimate for at least one city | $2,250 | $2,250 |
| Central one-bedroom rent | no data | no data |
Safety and health (country-level)
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Homicides per 100k | 0.49 | 0.49 |
| Political stability (0–100) | 81.7 | 81.7 |
| UHC service coverage (0–100) | 88 | 88 |
| Life expectancy | 83.6 yrs | 83.6 yrs |
Internet (M-Lab measured medians)
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Download | 89.3 Mbps ✓ | 85.6 Mbps |
| Upload | 87.8 Mbps ✓ | 84.3 Mbps |
Visa
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Nomad visa | Workcation (digital nomad) visa (F-1-D) | Workcation (digital nomad) visa (F-1-D) |
| Minimum income for the visa | $6,512/mo | $6,512/mo |
| Entry, US passport | 90 days | 90 days |
| Entry, EU passport | 90 days | 90 days |
| Entry, UK passport | 90 days | 90 days |
Getting there and around
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Non-stop airport destinations | 50 | 50 |
| Walkability (1–5, editorial) | 3 ✓ | 2 |
| Transit (1–5, editorial) | 2 | 2 |
Climate and air
| Metric | Changwon | Ulsan |
|---|---|---|
| Comfortable months per year | 1 | 3 ✓ |
| Annual mean PM2.5 | 20.1 µg/m³ ✓ | 20.3 µg/m³ |
✓ marks the better value in each row; ties and missing data are left unmarked.
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, Changwon or Ulsan?
- Changwon and Ulsan cost about the same: roughly $2,250 per month for one person.
- Is Changwon or Ulsan safer?
- Changwon and Ulsan score the same on safety (87), based on national homicide rates and World Bank political-stability scores.
- Where is the internet faster, Changwon or Ulsan?
- Changwon: a measured median of 89.3 Mbps versus 85.6 Mbps (M-Lab, 2024).
More comparisons
Sources: Cost of Living Global 2026 (city rows); 2026 Cost of Living Index (country level); Worldwide Governance Indicators — Political Stability and Absence of Violence (score 0–100); Victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population (national data, latest year); UHC service coverage index; Life expectancy at birth (years), both sexes; M-Lab NDT statistics (city aggregates, 2024); Airport destinations (Wikipedia airline and destination tables); NASA POWER climatology (2001–2020 monthly means); WHO Ambient Air Quality Database, June 2026 update (V8); SatPM2.5 satellite-derived annual PM2.5 (V6.GL.02.04); Human Development Index (HDR 2025, HDI 2023); EF English Proficiency Index 2024 (band); Walkability and transit ratings (editorial); Passport Index dataset (visa requirements, 199 passports × 199 destinations); OpenStreetMap restaurants (Overpass API); Nostos long-stay visa guides; Starlink availability map. Dataset 2026.11.2. See each city page for per-metric footnotes and the methodology.