Faro (Algarve) vs Naha (Okinawa)
for digital nomads
Under balanced weights Faro (Algarve) edges it, 72 to 67, winning 6 of the 9 factors. Faro (Algarve) is stronger on visa ease, cost of living, quality of life; Naha (Okinawa) on safety. Change the weights in the ranker to see which one wins for you.
Factor scores (0–100, balanced weights)
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of living | 44 ✓ | 24 |
| Safety | 83 | 98 ✓ |
| Healthcare | 84 | 92 ✓ |
| Internet | 70 | 76 ✓ |
| Visa ease | 84 ✓ | 61 |
| Getting there & around | 33 ✓ | 26 |
| Climate | 67 ✓ | 58 |
| Air quality | 100 ✓ | 97 |
| Quality of life | 86 ✓ | 74 |
Cost
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost, one personcountry-level estimate for at least one city | $1,719 ✓ | $2,700 |
| Central one-bedroom rent | $974 | no data |
Safety and health (country-level)
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Homicides per 100k | 0.8 | 0.2 ✓ |
| Political stability (0–100) | 75.1 | 85.3 ✓ |
| UHC service coverage (0–100) | 83 | 86 ✓ |
| Life expectancy | 81.2 yrs | 84.5 yrs ✓ |
Internet (M-Lab measured medians)
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Download | 46.2 Mbps | 55.2 Mbps ✓ |
| Upload | 25.1 Mbps | 47.9 Mbps ✓ |
Visa
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Nomad visa | Autorização de Residência para Atividade Profissional Prestada de Forma Remota (D8) | Status of Residence of “Designated Activities” (for Digital Nomad / Spouse or child of Digital Nomad) |
| Minimum income for the visa | $4,218/mo ✓ | $5,169/mo |
| Visa-free days, US passport | 90 days | 90 days |
| Visa-free days, EU passport | unlimited ✓ | 90 days |
| Visa-free days, UK passport | 90 days | 90 days |
Getting there and around
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Non-stop airport destinations | 90 ✓ | 41 |
| Walkability (1–5, editorial) | 4 ✓ | 3 |
| Transit (1–5, editorial) | 2 | 3 ✓ |
Climate and air
| Metric | Faro (Algarve) | Naha (Okinawa) |
|---|---|---|
| Comfortable months per year | 8 ✓ | 7 |
| Annual mean PM2.5 | 2.9 µg/m³ ✓ | 6.3 µg/m³ |
✓ marks the better value in each row; ties and missing data are left unmarked.
Frequently asked
- Which is cheaper, Faro (Algarve) or Naha (Okinawa)?
- Faro (Algarve) is cheaper: about $1,719 per month versus $2,700 for one person.
- Is Faro (Algarve) or Naha (Okinawa) safer?
- Naha (Okinawa) scores higher on safety (98 vs 83), based on national homicide rates and World Bank political-stability scores.
- Where is the internet faster, Faro (Algarve) or Naha (Okinawa)?
- Naha (Okinawa): a measured median of 55.2 Mbps versus 46.2 Mbps (M-Lab, 2024).
More comparisons
- Faro (Algarve) vs Porto
- Faro (Algarve) vs Málaga
- Naha (Okinawa) vs Taipei
- Naha (Okinawa) vs Porto
- All comparisons
Sources: Cost of Living Global 2026 (city rows); 2026 Cost of Living Index (country level); Digital Nomad Visas 2026; Worldwide Governance Indicators — Political Stability and Absence of Violence (score 0–100); Estimates of rates of homicides per 100 000 population; UHC service coverage index; Life expectancy at birth (years), both sexes; M-Lab NDT statistics (city aggregates, 2024); Airport destinations (Wikipedia airline and destination tables); NASA POWER climatology (2001–2020 monthly means); WHO Ambient Air Quality Database, June 2026 update (V8); Human Development Index (HDR 2025, HDI 2023); EF English Proficiency Index 2024 (band); Walkability and transit ratings (editorial); Passport Index dataset (visa requirements, 199 passports × 199 destinations). Dataset 2026.09.4. See each city page for per-metric footnotes and the methodology.